Tag Archives: politics

MIT Student attempts to create “Truth Goggles” for the news

Imagine the possibilities, not just for news consumers but producers. Enhanced spell check for journalists! A suspicious sentence is underlined, offering more factual alternatives. Or maybe Clippy chimes in: “It looks like you’re lying to your readers!” The software could even be extended to email clients to debunk those chain letters from your crazy uncle in Florida.

via Bull beware: Truth goggles sniff out suspicious sentences in news » Nieman Journalism Lab.

I don’t want to rain on this guy’s parade or anything, but the issue here isn’t that politicians lie and journalists often get their facts wrong. It’s that most readers don’t WANT the truth.

These aren’t mistakes that need to be corrected, in other words. The product contains these lies by design.

People who support Michele Bachmann don’t care that every other sentence coming out of her mouth is a complete fabrication, or at the very least, a strong exaggeration of the truth. They want validation for their mistaken beliefs at all costs. Truth is irrelevant. She’s handing them what they want to hear, and that’s far more powerful than the truth.

We’re not educating people here. We’re indoctrinating them.

The only people who want to know about her lies are the people on the Left, who aren’t interested in the truth either, really. They simply want validation for THEIR side of the story.

We all fall victim to this, though some to a larger degree than others.

The time when journalism’s job was to dispossess us of our mistaken beliefs is long gone.  Journalism is big business. They’re selling a product, and ultimately people buy bullshit more than the truth. That’s how it goes.

Politicians know this, which is why they keep spewing out the nonsense, even though they KNOW we have the resources at our fingertips to disprove every word they say. They’re completely comfortable lying about something they said yesterday, even after someone shows them the video of them saying it. Because while there’s always someone on the other side to call them on their lies, the people on their side will never see that. Rachael Maddow could scream her head off all day about Michele Bachmann, but not a single Fox News viewer will ever know. Rush Limbaugh can spend an entire day on a single incorrect statement from President Obama, and no one reading the Nation is going to know.

So while I respect what this guy is doing technologically, thinking it’s going to change anything is sort of silly.

AT&T, T-Mobile, and monopolies • Joshua Topolsky

But that seems unrealistic. I don’t think we can have our cake and eat it too. I don’t think the carriers will work together, and I don’t think we can let 25 different carriers have 25 different spectrums — that’s ultimately bad for business and the end user. I know this is a more complicated idea that requires bigger brains than mine to be tackled, but I also know (or at least strongly feel) that it’s something that needs to happen if we’re going to move forward from a technological standpoint. We need something better, something smarter. But is there any way we can remove politics and greed from this debate and actually do what’s best for human beings for once? I don’t see that on the horizon just yet.

I couldn’t agree with this article more. The current political climate in the US is going to cripple our ability to move forward technologically. We’re in serious danger of losing our ability to innovate, mostly because of low-level infrastructure that the government isn’t stepping in to build, and companies are unwilling to fund.

A company like Apple can’t continue to make the iPad and iPhone better if our connection to the Internet remains at the same speed and limited to the same places. As I’ve told many friends many times, until I can stream a full HD movie with no stuttering wirelessly while sitting in the middle of a corn field in Iowa, the true promise of the “cloud” won’t happen. Apple can’t fix that. AT&T can’t fix that.

There are simply too many situations where people don’t have access.

Some things are too big for any company to do. The government really does need to step in on the big necessities. And the Internet is surely one of those necessities at this point.

AT&T capping desktop Internet access. Cable companies will follow.

How does AT&T defend the move? The company explains it will only impact two percent of consumers who use “a disproportionate amount of bandwidth,” and poses the caps as an alternative to throttling transfer speeds or disconnecting excessive users from the service completely. Customers will be able to check their usage with an online tool, and get notifications when they reach 65 percent, 90 percent and 100 percent of their monthly rates.

This impacts two percent of customers today. What about five years from now? Once we all start streaming all of our television and movies through the Internet at 2160p, how many gigabytes will the average user be downloading a month?

Any sort of bandwidth cap is a huge step backwards for the Internet. It’s a step towards limiting access to only those who have the means to keep paying a premium. It creates, at best, a divided highway; one wide open five-lane autobahn with no speed limit for the rich, and one congested, two-lane, pot-holed mess for everyone else.

But our useless government won’t do anything to stop it.

Who wouldn’t want to visit the Baals Center?

Harry Baals is the runaway favorite in online voting to name the new building in Fort Wayne, about 120 miles northeast of Indianapolis. But Deputy Mayor Beth Malloy said that probably won’t be enough to put the name of the city’s longest-tenured mayor on the center.

The issue is pronunciation. The former mayor pronounced his last name “balls.” His descendants have since changed it to “bales.”

Supporters said it’s unfair that the former mayor can’t be recognized simply because his name makes some people snicker. But opponents fear that naming the center after Baals would make Fort Wayne the target of late-night television jokes.

“We realize that while Harry Baals was a respected mayor, not everyone outside of Fort Wayne will know that,” Malloy said Tuesday in a statement to The Associated Press. “We wanted to pick something that would reflect our pride in our community beyond the boundaries of Fort Wayne.”

These guys are missing the point. If the former mayor’s name sparks late night jokes, that’s tons of free advertising, and a guarantee that the new building will reach a national audience. They’d be stupid NOT to name the building after him.

It never hurts to show the world that you don’t take yourself too seriously, either. I say have a little fun with it.

Senator Al Franken understands the gravity of the Comcast merger

When it comes to the Comcast merger, Franken was even more vocal. “As you probably know, I hate this merger,” he told the group. Not only will it raise prices on TV subscriptions, it will give the combined entity incredible power to stifle competition from online sources like Netflix.

“I’m hearing that Comcast is already preparing to pull NBC Universal’s programming from Netflix when it’s next up for review,” Franken said. The cable industry is worried about the threat from cheaper options like Netflix; “they aren’t stupid and they want to shut it down.”

Franken even referenced the current controversy over Level 3′s peering arrangements with Comcast (Level 3 just won a major contract from Netflix to deliver its content). Comcast’s move to charge for this interconnection is, in Franken’s view, “a clear warning sign of what we can all expect if this deal goes through.”

As he was giving that speech, the merger did go through yesterday, signed off on by the FCC and the Department of Justice. As for what’s next, Franken just sees a new wave of mega-consolidation in which AT&T tries to buy ABC/Disney while Verizon goes after CBS.

“Now is the time to decide if we want four or five companies owning and delivering all of our information and entertainment,” he said.

I’m with Senator Franken on this. It’s no small matter. Not only are we going to see increased prices from less competition. Not only will good alternatives like Netflix get crushed under the weight of giant conglomerates; we’re also going to see even more stifling control over the media message in this country. It’s bad enough that stations like Fox News already have so much influence over a portion of our population. With mergers like the latest Comcast merger that went through yesterday, we may soon live in a country where ONLY stations like Fox News exist. All bias, all the time. Sort of a reverse of what England has with the BBC. Instead of the government running the networks, the networks will run our government.

Have no illusions. The 1% that have all the money in the U.S. have been working toward this goal for a very long time. Rather than controlling the population with an army, as you would in a dictatorship, they use the media to achieve the same goal in this democracy. They’ve owned radio for quite a while already. Television is the next frontier.

The Catholic Church understood in the days of the Holy Roman Empire that language was power. That’s why it never wanted the Bible translated into other languages. If only the priests knew latin, then only the priests could understand God’s word. And everyone else had to trust their interpretation. Control the message, and you control the population. Same basic principle here.

I fear it may already be too late to stop this.